[ Pricing ]

Priced by scope,
not by seats.

You pay for the attack surface Cybörü actually proves — not for how many people log in. Run a single target once, stay continuously covered, or build an enterprise program. Prices below are illustrative; every engagement is scoped with you.

[ Plans ]

Pick the cadence,
we'll size the surface.

01

Run

A single target, proven once.

from $7,500/ engagement
  • One scope, fully exercised end-to-end
  • Full recon → chain → exploit loop
  • Proof-backed findings, no CVSS noise
  • Reproducible exploit artifacts
  • Turnaround in days, not weeks
02Most popular

Continuous

Your live surface, re-tested as it changes.

from $4,000/ month
  • Always-on re-testing as code & infra ship
  • Drift alerts when new surface appears
  • Operator-steerable runs you can redirect
  • Deduplicated findings across cycles
  • Trend view of exploitable risk over time
03

Enterprise

Fleets, subsidiaries and regulated programs.

Custom
  • Unlimited scopes across business units
  • Fail-closed scope governance & audit log
  • SSO, role controls and data residency
  • Dedicated solutions engineer
  • SLA-backed coverage and reporting
[ What every plan includes ]

The same engine, on every tier.

Full surface, every run

No sampling, and no add-on tier for deeper coverage. Every engagement reasons across the whole authorized scope.

Proof, not noise

You only ever read findings backed by a reproducible exploit path. Theoretical CVSS scores never make the bill.

Scope-safe by default

Fail-closed enforcement keeps every action inside the boundary you set — the same guardrail on Run and Enterprise alike.

[ FAQ ]

Questions about pricing.

Why price by scope instead of per seat?

Seat-based pricing rewards inviting people, not finding risk. Cybörü is autonomous — the work is proving what is exploitable across an attack surface, so you pay for the surface it covers, not how many of your team log in.

What counts as one scope?

A scope is a coherent boundary you authorize — a domain and its subdomains, an application, or a cloud account. You define it explicitly, and fail-closed enforcement keeps every action inside it.

Is a one-off Run different from Continuous?

Same engine, different cadence. A Run exercises a scope once and ships proof. Continuous keeps that loop alive, re-testing automatically as your code and infrastructure change so new exposure is caught the day it appears.

How fast do we see proof?

Most single-scope Runs return reproducible findings within days. Continuous coverage surfaces newly exploitable paths as soon as a cycle confirms them — typically the same week the change ships.

Prove what's exploitable —
before an attacker does.